Home

Products / English


English

Français Italiano Español Português Català Maltin

Deutsch Nederlands Lëtzebuergesch Gaeilge Scottish Dansk Svenska Norsk Íslensku Suomalainen Eestlane Latvietis Lietuvis

Pусский Беларус українська Polski Česky Slovenský Magyar Română Slovenščina Hrvatski Bosanski Српски Shqiptar български македонски Ελληνικά ქართული Türk हिन्दी

عربى

中国 日本語 한국어




On our English pages, you often see the word "relationships". This is just sanitized language. On our English pages, "relationships" refers to what couples, when not sleeping, do in bed. Or, if so inclined, on the kitchen table.

English is a rather hypocritical language. Many words for natural bodily functions and processes have dirty connotations, and polite speakers like us have to go to considerable length to communicate meanings without naming them. But we nevertheless hope you get the point.


Tongkat ali changes your life and changes your mind: from now on, everything else is subordinate to great relationships


By Serge Kreutz

Many people, most people, almost all people believe that libido (relationships drive, relationships desire) is a mental process. But they have wrong ideas. Libido is very much a physical property.

To be more specific, libido is brain biochemistry.

The proof for libido as a physical property is in the ease by which it can be disabled by a wide range of pharmaceuticals, ranging from chemical castration to Prozac-style anti-depressants.

And even though it is easier to make something kaputt than building something, libido, relationships drive, and relationships desires can also be pharmacologically constructed.

The technology may still be crude, but you can work with tongkat ali, butea superba, krachai dam, and mucuna pruriens. All are available from Sumatra Pasak Bumi.

If we agree that basically, libido, relationships drive, and relationships desires are manifestations of brain chemistry just as sweat is a manifestation of sweat glands, we can go a step further.

Because just as libido is a manifestation of brain chemistry, whole systems of belief and ideology, too, are the output of biochemical structures.

The train of deduction runs like this: biochemistry (pharmacologically modified or not) is responsible for high or low libido, for strong or weak relationships drive, and for compelling or absent relationships desires.

Men with compelling relationships desires have different opinions, compared with men who do not have relationships desires at all. Not just different opinions, but different constructs of opinion, or, in short, different ideologies.

Ideologies are constructs of opinion that guard an individual's interests. Cattle breeders believe that eating beef is healthy. And orchard owners advocate fruit. That's natural.

From a slightly different perspective: ideologies articulate excuses for our economic, or emotional, or relationships parameters.

Men with loads of libido, a strong relationships drive, and compelling relationships desires will have a different ideology than men who can't be bothered with even just flirting because they anyway can't get it up.

Men with no relationships drive have a natural ideological home in the kind of feminism that considers all penetration a form of severe violence.

On the other hand, men with loads of libido want a social order that allows them an easy pursuit of mostly casual relationships.

So here we go: tongkat ali, and even more so a stack of tongkat ali, butea superba, krachai dam, and mucuna pruriens (velvet beans) generate strong libido. One step further, strong libido creates its own assessment of the world... a world in which nothing is more important than good relationships. And because all started with tongkat ali, this world-view is appropriately named: the tongkat ali ideology.

The corner stone of the tongkat ali ideology is this: we, mostly men, want a social order that allows us to live out our libido, without male relationships conduct being understood, with few exceptions, as relationships harassment, or worth.

Diametrically opposed to our tongkat ali ideology are some forms of feminism, pretty popular in Europe and the Americas, which blames male sexuality, especially the sexuality of old white men, for practically every presumed social ill.


References:

Claussen, C. (2017) Men engaging boys in healthy masculinity through school-based relationships health education. Journal Relationships Education Sexuality,Society and Learning. Volume 19 Issue 2, Pages 115-129 Tongkatali.org Bibliography

Corredor, E. ( 2019) Unpacking Gender Ideology and the Global Right’s Anti-Gender Countermovement - Forthcoming in the Spring 2019 issue of Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. Signs Journal of Women in Culture and Society Retrieved from: researchgate.net Unpacking Gender Ideology and the Global Right's Anti-Gender Countermovement - Forthcoming in the Spring 2019 issue of Signs Journal of Women in Culture and Society

Ongwisespaiboon, O, Jiraungkoorskul, W. (2017) Fingerroot, Boesenbergia rotunda and its Aphrodisiac Activity Pharmacognosy Reviews Volume 11 Issue 21 Tongkatali.org Bibliography

Retzler, K., (2019) Erectile dysfunction A review of comprehensive treatment options for optimal outcome. Journal Restorative Medicine Vol 8 No 1 Tongkatali.org Bibliography

Talbott, S., (2013) Human performance and sports applications of tongkat ali. Nutrition and Enhanced Sports Performance, Chapter 53 Pages 501-505 Tongkatali.org Bibliography

van der Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C. (2019) The O'Reilly factor: An ideological bias in judgments about relationships harassment. Personality and Individual Differences Volume 139, Pages 198-201 Tongkatali.org Bibliography

Yadav, M.K., Upadhyay, P., Purohit, P., Pandey, B. (2017) Phytochemical and pharmacological activity mucuna pruriens. International Journal of Green Pharmacy Volume 11 Issue 02 Pages 69-73 Tongkatali.org Bibliography


Any man deeply involved with relationships enhancement will likely develop an ideology that allows relationships adventures (Your life according to tongkat ali, part one)


By Serge Kreutz


The opinions each man holds are a reflection of that persons interests. Or, with Karl Marx: It is not the consciousness of men that determines their being, but, on the contrary, their social being that determines their consciousness.

Article continues below printscreens

Marx wasn't complete. Because it's not only our social existence which shapes our consciousness. Many biological parameters also do: the degree of our relationships agitation, the level of our fear, and, last not least, the state of our health.

But what Marx was correct about, is this: our consciousness is not a foundation on which we judge the world. Our consciousness is but a product of our life circumstances.

A 50-year old man with a strong libido, effected by a stack of tongkat ali, butea superba, mucuna pruriens, and krachai dam, will hold other opinions about life than a 50-year old man who has lost all interest in relationships.

A man who has lost all interest in relationships will likely believe that it is normal for a normal man his age to no longer be interested in relationships. He will likely advocate a society which emphasizes other aspects of life, rather than relationships satisfaction.

Tongkat ali and other herbal used for relationships enhancement, such as butea superba, mucuna pruriens, kaempferia parviflora, and boesenbergia rotunda definitely make men sexually adventurous. Relationships enhancement will lead many, but not all men to a lifestyle as controversial as that of pickup artists. Many men on tongkat ali or a tongkat ali stack will not stay committed to monogamous relationships.

Sexuality-enhancing men will likely develop certain philosophical, even political, views not for reasons of principle but because they will likely be associated with easier relationships opportunities.

Take for example the concept of personal freedom.

For men who optimize relationships with tongkat ali et al, a high degree of personal freedom is conducive to scoring in relationships adventures.

Unfortunately, the more developed human societies become, the more is personal freedom curtailed. It is a direct offshoot of the modes of production of humanity at its current stage. Available technologies make a higher degree of governmental control possible, so control exists.

At the same time, modern communication technologies produce a widespread distribution of knowledge, even to people with limited intellectual capabilities.

Control technologies and information distribution technologies in modern democracies lead to many nitwitted government policies, and to freedom-limiting control.

People may dream about intellectual elites imposing personal freedom, Plato-style. That has a dim chance.

Article continues below printscreens

Or anarchists implementing non-governmental rule. The practical experience has been that grassroot-regulations are even more controlling.

Or radical libertarians doing away with a lot of government involvement. But their focus is capitalist freedom, not personal freedom, and because of conservative inclinations among libertarians, it is unclear what amount of relationships freedom would be available under their rule.

Article continues below printscreens

The best bet for personal freedom is chaos. Not the creation of societies of personal freedom, but the dismantling, even destruction, of societies of freedom-limitating control. In an environment of conflict and chaos, people have other problems than controlling male relationships behavior, and men who enhance sexuality with tongkat ali and other herbals will have a higher chance of meeting relationships opportunities which would not be available in an environment of social control.

POWER OR ANONYMITY

In a society, large or small, with an absolute ruler who may be a king, a dictator, a warlord, or a mafia boss, the ruler presumably enjoys a maximum of personal freedom. He is also in danger of being assassinated, or simply murdered.

Article continues below printscreens

A society may be ruled in an authoritarian manner, but only if there is a sense that the way it is ruled is beneficial to many will there be general contentment, and thus a low level of conflict, and good public safety.

Being a dictatorial leader, or even a mafia boss, may have its pleasures, for some time, but the likelihood of something else, rather than a comfortable death is high. Personal freedom isn’t guaranteed for the man on the top, too. Too many security guards of ultimately doubtful loyalty, and too much attention from subjects, and nowadays the international community.

In the modern world, personal freedom requires anonymity, the more the better.


Liberty dependeth on the Silence of the Law

Our tongkat ali ideology has nothing in common with the 19th century dreamers who believed that with the abolition of states, mankind would enter a paradise of mutual aid.

Furthermore, the ideology of men enhancing sexuality with tongkat ali is totally different from the beliefs of labour union activists of the 20th century who seriously thought that private property is the sole culprit for everything evil in this world.

Our tongkat ali ideology is closer to Thomas Hobbes, who (in the 17th century) reasoned that the function of state power is to prevent and control physical violence among the members of a society (a night-watchman state), and that, apart from that, as he write in his Leviathan: “Liberty dependeth on the Silence of the Law.”

Article continues below printscreens


An intellectual avant-garde imposing personal freedom

Imposed freedom has a long history.

Plato considered rule by philosophers who imposed their wise decisions upon citizens way superior to democracy.

During the age of enlightenment in Europe, civil liberties were, in many cases, not taken by those who later enjoyed them, but granted by rulers like Napoleon or Prussia's Frederic the Great who were influenced by philosophers like Voltaire or Kant.

Article continues below printscreens

After World War II, constitutions were imposed on Germany and Japan which embedded a high degree of personal freedom.

On the other hand, there has been a definite trend over the past few decades for democratic political systems to curtail the personal freedom of those ruled.

The fault is with democracy itself. Voters, once they have gained self-confidence, are always more likely to express negative, rather than positive sentiments in elections.

More freedom will not be achieved anytime soon by giving a majority of people with limited intellectual capacities ever more power over the political fate of a country.

That an intellectual avant-garde, elected or not, imposes freedom is a much more distinct possibility than more personal freedom resulting from ever more democracy.

If the intellectual avant-garde is in power only for a limited period of time, then its legacy should be a constitution that strongly limits the power of subsequent parliaments and governments to curtail the freedom of those ruled.



Tongkatali.org's Size matters


By Serge Kreutz


The published public opinion, especially the female published opinion, is wrong in its assessment on why men are concerned about the size of their organs.

The public published opinion, and views held publicly by female commentators on the matter, assume that men are concerned about the size of their organs on the basis of a rather childish attitude just like when eight-year-old boys try a far arc while urinating, and then boast about it.

The common published opinion tends to belittle the concern of men about organ size. An example is the following remark of relationships adviser Ruth Westheimer, quoted from the TIME cover story of May 4, 1998: “Even if a man has an erection from floor to ceiling and can keep it that way for an hour, it will not be pleasurable for a woman if he is not sexually literate.”

This is making ridicule out of a serious concern.

Of course, until recently, all relationships therapists could offer men with insufficient erections, or a small organ, was some consolation of the above kind.

Published opinion may be quite different from the opinion held privately by people who are represented by a specific general published opinion. The publishing trade has its own rules on what opinions may be offered in public. The motto of a major US publication used to be (or still is): All the news that’s fit to print. (Not: All the news that’s true.) And in the opinion of newspaper editors, it’s not fit to say that organ size is of importance when assessing the qualities of a man.

Sorry, but size does matter. And men would probably not be concerned about size, if they wouldn’t have learned from intimate experience that it’s important. They learn it from their female relationships partners when discussing relationships matters. When they engage in relationships talk with their female partners, many men will be confronted with women’s fantasies in which rather large-sized male organs play a role. It’s not common that women’s fantasies center on disfigured, under-sized, or flaccid male organs.

It may be true that most women who do experience orgasms experience them clitoral. More than 90 percent of all women are easier to bring to an orgasm through clitoral stimulation than through vaginal penetration. However, there are women who prefer to be brought to an orgasm through vaginal penetration, and in such cases, sufficient size, sufficient rigidity, and sufficient staying power are absolutely necessary. Relationships technique is a distant fourth. Usually, woman who can experience vaginal orgasms will anyway apply their own technique.

Furthermore, when it comes to vaginal orgasms, no one single technique fits all women. Some prefer quick short thrusts from below, others rather have it from behind. Often, women who can experience vaginal orgasms like to do the moving, and prefer a static man.

While clitoral orgasms result in rhythmic contractions of the pelvic area, including the vagina, there often is a magic additional component in vaginal orgasms: a ballooning of the Grafenberg area (the front vaginal wall near the vaginal opening), and a move forward of the cervix. Both these reactions can exert an expelling pressure on the inserted organ. A marvelous experience, available probably only to men with a sufficiently large organ.

But even among women who can be brought to an orgasm through clitoral stimulation, the idea of big, hard organs plays a major role in their fantasies. The stimulation may be clitoral, but the fantasies that are absolutely necessary to make clitoral stimulation an orgasmic success may still center on penetration and usually on penetration by a large male organ.

While the editors of periodicals anywhere around the world may only be willing to touch the topic of organ size in a manner that ridicules the concern, organ size clearly is a major aspect when it comes to the qualities of a man as a lover.

We seldom receive email from women who are of the opinion that organ size is not important. But we regularly receive feedback that confirms that a large organ is an important attribute. Here some comments by one female reader, Ka.:

– quote –

Hello,

I stumbled on your website a few hours ago. I very much enjoyed your essays. It’s almost 5 am here (Toronto, Canada), and I just stopped reading.

I just keyed in “love” into my search engine…I don’t even know why (I guess I just wanted to focus on something sweet before bed). Your inclusion of our neurology was great. And your sincerity was refreshing. I’ll read a few more of your articles tomorrow night.

Now, I got a few questions:

1. You praise tongkat ali very much. I heard that it raises your testosterone levels through the roof (which I guess would explain irritability, and relationships desire). But do you know how it effects woman? (Not that I need help in the arousal department). Just curious.

2. In your essay: “Female Orgasm in Asia”, you spoke about the female orgasm…and so on. I need to say this (actually to all the men in the world): Please don’t act like you are on a mission in bed. There were plenty of men who were determined to give me an orgasm…and I just ended up faking it. Once it seems that the guy is on a mission…the magic is gone. For me, I can be immensely satisfied without an orgasm (if one happens: great!… but if it doesn’t…then leave it alone).

3. You also talked about organ size. Well: IT MATTERS! (At least to me). There was a time that if I liked a guy, and thought that there may be potential for a more serious relationship, I would take things slow, not sleep with him right away… bla bla… But now: I try to get him into bed quickly. I don’t want to start liking him… and so on… and then find out he is tiny down there. For me it doesn’t have to be huge, but it has to be at least average. And for me, it’s not a psychological thing. I want to feel filled! And if he is not at least average, then I don’t want to waste my time with him. I don’t want to marry a man that is small. He can give the best oral in the world… but if he can’t stuff me properly… then I’m gone. I don’t want to get emotionally attached, no matter how great they are, and then find out I’m gonna be cheating on them for sure if we continue.

Please don’t get me wrong: it doesn’t have to be mega huge… but at least average. I dated a few “small” men. Sometimes I wondered what the point of us having relationships was. Cuz for me nothing beats the main course.

4. I don’t understand how increasing dopamine levels can help a man get erect. Doesn’t cocaine increase the amount of dopamine in your synapses? But… enough cocaine… and a man just can’t get it up. I don’t get it. (I dated a cocaine user…and there were soooooooooooooooooo many disappointments.)

Don’t feel like you have to rush with the answers.

Thanks,

Ka.

P.S. Looking forward to reading more articles of yours!

– unquote –

We left Ka.’s mail unedited. As questions have been asked, we include the answers of our reply mail.

– quote –

Ka.,

thank you for your interesting contributions.

Tongkat ali indeed raises testosterone. This has been shown in many scientific studies.

Dopamine enhancement works for libido, not for erections. Cocaine users get sexually agitated (in the head) but can’t perform. Not only will they have weak erections; they will also typically have rather small organs, even when they do get an erection. The reason is too much sympathetic tone.

Cheers

– unquote –

Back to organ size. Luckily, organ size, like erectile capacity and staying power, can be worked upon and improved.

For erectile capacity and staying power upon demand, sildenafil citrate (Pfizer’s Blue) is the drug of first choice. Sildenafil citrate is not just for 50-year-old diabetics or 60-year-old prostatectomy survivors. Even 25-year-olds can benefit from low doses of the drug. (And the drug is a necessity for cocaine users.)

For the improvement of basic organ size, there are two options: either pull and pull with methods described as penile exercise programs, or have the Leydig cells of your testicles synthesize more testosterone. Organ and testicle size is heavily dependent on testosterone synthesis. That Leydig cells start to synthesize testosterone is what causes the organ and testicles of boys to grow to man size. Furthermore, bodybuilders or athletes who use exogenous testosterone or steroids pay for it by testicular and penile shrinkage. Because they supply more testosterone than the body (more specifically: the hypothalamus) wants, the testes shut down the Leydig cells, and the testicles and organ revert to boyhood size.

The only herbal that stimulates the Leydig cells to synthesize more testosterone is tongkat ali (Eurycoma longifolia by scientific name), which is why heavy tongkat ali usage causes penile and testicular growth, independent of erections.

Of course, more than any other organ, the organ is variable in size. The size of a organ at any given time will depend on body chemistry. Vasoconstrictive nutrients such as caffeine and theobromine, as well as drugs that enhance the sympathetic autonomous nervous system (cocaine, amphetamines) will cause temporary testicular and penile shrinkage.

Beta blockers, which increase the levels of circulating adrenaline by blocking the hormone’s binding to cardiovascular sites, thus increasing adrenaline’s effect on abdominal receptors, will temporarily reduce organ size and interfere with erectile capabilities. No permanent damage.




PT Sumatra Pasak Bumi
7th floor, Forum Nine, Jl. Imam Bonjol No.9,
Petisah Tengah, Medan Petisah,
Medan City, North Sumatra 20236,
Indonesia
Tel: +62-813 800 800 20


Disclaimer: Statements and products on this page have not undergone the FDA approval process.


Privacy policy of Sumatra Pasak Bumi

For us at Sumatra Pasak Bumi, privacy in the age of the Internet is a major concern, and we greatly welcome the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

We have always been dedicated to privacy protection. The snooping and spooking of all and everybody is a pest. It’s not just the NSA and every large search engine and browser (we recommend Duckduckgo for searches and as browser), but even minor businesses that do their databases and customer profiling in hope of McDonald's style do-you-want-fries-with-that cross sales.

We don’t.

We respect the privacy of customers and people visiting our website. Our site is run from a secure socket layer. We do not use cookies. We do not maintain customer accounts for logging in later. Our website is simple html programming, and we don't even use WordPress templates or e-commerce plug-ins. We don't do a newsletter to which customers could subscribe, and we don't even include standard social media buttons that would link visitors of our site to certain Facebook or Twitter profiles.

We prefer communication by email using a gmail account because this is probably still the most private mode of communication (Hillary may disagree), and when we have information to disseminate to the public, we just publish it on our website. We do offer the option to communicate with us by chat apps if a site visitor so wishes, but prefer email.

If privacy is your concern, you are in good hands with us.